Challenge 10 Reviving Dead Zones: Combating Ocean Deoxygenation and Nutrient Runoff

THE PROBLEM
Nutrient pollution in coastal areas, which primarily results from agricultural fertilizer runoff and sewage, has led to a rapid increase in hypoxic zones in the ocean. In the last half a century, the number of dead zones in the world’s oceans has increased over ten- fold. The paucity of oxygen in these areas results in aerobic marine life dying or moving away. Habitats once rich in life become dead zones, the equivalent of deserts in the ocean. This problem is accentuated by warming and worsened by acidification. The triple threat of deoxygenation, warming, and acidification has been associated with past major extinctions.

THE CHALLENGE
End deoxygenation by disrupting and redesigning systems of agriculture and wastewater management on land:

1. Redesign the farm-to-sea relationship to remove anthropogenic nutrient runoff;

2. Design scalable innovations for storm water and wastewater treatment and removal of excess nutrients such as phosphates and nitrogen.

3. Develop new ways to restore dead zones.

PROBLEM STATEMENT
Nutrient runoff and waste from agriculture and sewage has contributed to widespread instances of dead zones— regions of widespread hypoxia (areas without oxygen). This hypoxia either kills marine life, reduces their reproductive potential, or forces species to move to new habitats. Dead zones commonly occur near inhabited coastlines, where marine biodiversity is often highest, and where communities and ecosystems depend upon healthy habitats. The extent of the losses from such dead zones can be economically and biologically significant. In the Black Sea in the 1970s and 1980s, an estimated 60 million tons of bottom-living aquatic life perished from hypoxia, resulting in dramatic impacts on fisheries and biodiversity.

During the 20th century, the rapid industrialization of agriculture, coupled with human population growth and urbanization, has led to a massive increase in number and size of dead zones globally. In 1960, there were 10 documented dead zones, but by 2007 scientists had identified 169. Currently, scientists estimate there may be over 1,000 dead zones around the world, including many that are undocumented. Concentrated in areas with high human activity, these dead zones are a result of disrupting natural biogeochemical cycles.

The mechanism by which these dead zones occur—rapid eutrophication— also offers opportunities for intervention. The excessive supply of nutrients, mainly phosphates and nitrogen, spark the growth of phytoplankton and lead to algal blooms. The water becomes more opaque as phytoplankton populations boom, and the shade they cast deprives the plants living below them of sunlight. Sea grasses in shallow bays also become covered with small epiphytic algae and can ultimately be smothered and die. Algae can also envelop and kill off coral reefs. The critical shift happens when the massive blooms of phytoplankton and other organisms die. As organic matter accumulates, bacteria digest the organic matter and consume the oxygen present in the water during the decomposition process, creating hypoxic conditions.

This hypoxia is caused primarily by the intensive use of agricultural fertilizers, particularly in the developed world. Globally, farmers spend $60 billion annually for 150 million tons of fertilizer to nourish their fields. Much of this may be wasted. Farmers often apply excess fertilizers or have poor systems to keep fertilizers in the soil. Rain and irrigation then washes excess fertilizer into inland waterways, and ultimately to the ocean. Currently, less than half of the fixed nitrogen generated by farming practices actually ends up in harvested crops, and less than half of the nitrogen in those crops actually ends up in the foods that humans consume. Much of the remainder ends up fertilizing phytoplankton and algae in the ocean.

Additional drivers of greater nutrient emissions into watersheds include fossil- fuel use (which releases nitrogen into the atmosphere), effluent from the mass breeding of food animals (especially pigs and chickens), and sewage systems that empty directly into the sea. Untreated sewage causes the majority of dead zones in Africa, Asia, and South America. The presence of large-scale aquaculture in Southeast Asia may also contribute to hypoxia.

EMERGING SOLUTIONS
Transforming Inputs: With burgeoning global populations, understanding how we can increase plant productivity while decreasing its environmental footprint will usher in the second green revolution. The ability to harness nitrogen-fixing microbes for widespread agricultural practices could allow for more efficient use of nitrogen as a fertilizer, or even lead to its elimination. One sterling example is the current effort to transfer Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, a bacterium found in sugar cane that fixes nitrogen from the air into the cells of plant roots such as maize, rice, wheat, oilseed rape, and tomatoes. This type of approach could obviate the need for nitrogen fertilizer in much of the world’s agricultural land. A similar approach involves synthetically engineering the genome of certain crops, such as rice, to take up nitrogen directly. Precision agriculture, the use of nitrogen- fixing cover crops, and traditional breeding techniques can also increase nitrogen efficacy in soils. The National Academy of Engineering has called for research and discovery of novel technological methods for applying fertilizer more efficiently to ensure that a much higher percentage of the fertilizer ends up in the plants as organic nitrogen. Other critical innovations are needed in soil management and design to reduce runoff, leaching, and erosion, which carry much of the nitrogen fertilizer away from the plants and into groundwater and surface water.

Addressing Pollutants: Grassroots entrepreneurs are beginning to use the natural by-products of excessive nutrient outflows, namely macro-algae and seaweed, as harvestable resources. Approaches that unify land-based and marine farming practices in a closed- loop system have been designed to capture nutrient runoff for use in growing marine macro-algae that can be used in local agriculture. A Washington, D.C.-based startup, Kegotank Bio, has begun to plant and harvest macro-algae at the source of excessive nutrient outflows in freshwater and saltwater systems and then converts the harvested material into marketable products, from natural fertilizer to thickeners for a variety of mainstream products. Other approaches, such as Janiki Bioenergy Omniprocessor, turn sewage into potable water, electricity, and fertilizer, and turn sewage treatment for developing countries into a source of revenue.

New Open Innovation Challenges for Reducing Pollutants: As nutrient flows have caused a growing dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico and affected the wetlands in and around the Mississippi River Delta, a set of challenges and prizes have been launched to advance detection and reduction efforts. The Tulane Nitrogen Reduction Grand Challenge, launched in 2014, has begun identifying promising solutions to reduce nutrient pollution and manage dead zones. The ACT-EPA Nutrient Sensor Challenge, launched in 2014, is seeking low-cost, real-time sensors that can measure dissolved nitrogen and phosphorous concentrations. The Everglades Foundation recently announced a $10 million prize for innovations that can remove excessive phosphorus from waterways and recycle it into fueling the world’s food supply. While several incentives in the form of prizes and challenges have arisen in the areas of detection and removal of nutrients, the timelines of the challenges are such that the potential recipients remain many years away from scaling their work into viable solutions.

Financial Mechanisms: Nutrient trading has become a popular market-based tool to attribute monetary values to point source pollution and non-point source runoff from wastewater and agricultural activity, enabling a market to trade and manage those nutrient flows. States including Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia have launched online nutrient trading platforms to calculate values of sources and facilitate more efficient and cost-effective processes for managing nutrient pollution that ultimately ends up in coastal waters like the Chesapeake Bay. Expansion of these programs, as well as refinement of their models, can better harness emerging tools and technologies in managing nutrient flows at their source.